14 November 2008

furrry: (cisco)
Ну что, кто страдал без NAT в IPv6? Любой ваш каприз за ваши деньги. Встречайте: NAT66

P.S. "the IETF does not recommend the use of NAT"(c). Хоть кто-то меня поддерживает.


P.P.S. Раздел "Motivation" прекрасен:
"We are documenting NAT66 because we believe that some people will
choose to implement and deploy IPv6 NAT, in spite of our
recommendation not to do so.....Our goal is to define an IPv6-to-
IPv6 NAT mechanism, NAT66, that will minimize the negative impacts of
IPv6 NAT, in the event that some implementers do choose to implement
an IPv6 NAT mechanism, and some network administrators do choose to
deploy it."

Profile

furrry: (Default)
Jen

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 4 June 2025 04:26
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios